Peer review in academic publishing: threats and challenges
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Peer Review in Academic Promotion and Publishing: Its Meaning, Locus and Future
Since 2005, and with generous support from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, The Future of Scholarly Communication Project at UC Berkeley's Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE) has been exploring how academic values—including those related to peer review, publishing, sharing, and collaboration—influence scholarly communication practices and engagement with new technological affordances, open...
متن کاملAffirming science and peer-review publishing.
896 Am J Health-Syst Pharm—Vol 66 May 15, 2009 Copyright © 2009, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/09/0502-0896$06.00. Affirming science and peer-review publishing of scientific exploration if researchers felt constrained from publicly reporting such differences. For publishers, the decision defends the sanctity of the time-honored peer-review pr...
متن کاملOpen access, predatory publishing and peer-review
* In recent years, scholarly publishing faced a new paradigm regarding the accessibility: the open access movement. " If an article is "Open Access" it means that it can be freely accessed by anyone in the world using an internet connection ". 1 The Budapest Open Access Initiative states: " By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any...
متن کاملChallenges for Peer Review
Peer review is not a fraud detection system. Referees are likely to detect some wrongdoing, such as copying someone else’s research or misrepresenting data, because they care about their subject. They know what research has been conducted already and the kinds of results that are likely. However, if someone deliberately sets out to falsify data, there is sometimes no way of knowing this until t...
متن کاملChallenges for Peer Review
Peer review is not a fraud detection system. Referees are likely to detect some wrongdoing, such as copying someone else’s research or misrepresenting data, because they care about their subject. They know what research has been conducted already and the kinds of results that are likely. However, if someone deliberately sets out to falsify data, there is sometimes no way of knowing this until t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
سال: 2019
ISSN: 1478-2715,2042-8189
DOI: 10.4997/jrcpe.2019.201